Food Microbiology Methods in Validation
View: 237
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501125LIVE?channel=mailer&camp=Webinar&A |
Edit Freely
Category Laboratory Technicians, Laboratory Managers
Deadline: March 20, 2017 | Date: March 21, 2017
Venue/Country: Online Event, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-01-16 20:34:45 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview: The Webinar will discuss the practical distinction between and method validation and method verification and the requirements of each analytical approach to comply with ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005 for a microbiology laboratory accreditation.Areas Covered in the Session:The difference between method validation and verificationThe performance characteristics for method validationPerformance requirements for method verificationHow to implement a verification protocol that defines a method’s fitness-for purposeWho Will Benefit:Quality Assurance ManagersLaboratory TechniciansLaboratory ManagersRegulatory Compliance OfficersConsultantsNew employees in your food safety and quality laboratoriesSpeaker Profile:Michael Brodsky has been an Environmental Microbiologist for more than 41 years. He is a Past President of the Ontario Food Protection Association and AOAC International. He serves as Chair for the AOAC Expert Review Committee for Microbiology, as a scientific reviewer in Microbiology for the AOAC OMA and the AOAC Research Institute, as a reviewer for Standard Method for the Examination of Water and as a chapter editor on QA for the Compendium of Methods in Microbiology.Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.