Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link|

Our Sponsors

  • ESTA - Electronic System for Travel Authorization
Receive Latest News

Share Us

FDA inspectional - Training Practices for FDA Compliance - 2017

View: 120

Website | Edit Freely

Category FDA Compliance, Regulatory Trainings, FDA Webinars, Effective Training Practices, Regulatory affairs, Validation specialists, requirements in US and EU, training program, Compliance Trainings, Online Trainings, usa fremont compliance4all webinar 2017

Deadline: September 20, 2017 | Date: September 21, 2017

Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A

Updated: 2017-07-17 16:03:11 (GMT+9)

Call For Papers - CFP


Trainings are either not planned, not conducted, not evaluated or not documented as expected by inspectors. On the other hand it has been is estimated that about 5% of employee's time is spent for training.

Areas Covered in the Session:

GxP training requirements in US and EU

Most frequently cited deviations

Developing an effective training program for a company, site or department

Developing a training plan for individual employees

Who can or should be responsible for the training program and training plans

Who Will Benefit:

Training Departments

QA Managers and Personnel

Analysts and Lab Managers

Validation Specialists

Regulatory Affairs

Speaker Profile:

Ludwig Huber Ph.D., is the director and editor of Labcompliance the global online resource for validation and compliance. He is the author of the books "Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories" and "Validation of Computerized Analytical and Networked Systems, Informa Healthcare".

Event Cost & Details:

One Dial-in One Attendee Price: US$150.00

Contact Detail:

Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,

Phone: +1-800-447-9407


Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.