Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    HIPAA HYBRID ENTITIES 2017 - HIPAA Hybrid Entities - What If Healthcare is Only a Part of What You Do

    View: 244

    Website http://www.mentorhealth.com/control/w_product/~product_id=801038LIVE?ourglocal.com_August_2017_SEO | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category hybrid entity under hipaa regulations,hipaa standards online training,hipaa protected health information,Hipaa Laws And Regulations Webinar,hipaa compliance training,upcomming hipaa webinars,hipaa changes 2017,online healthcare training Webinar,online hipaa training

    Deadline: August 16, 2017 | Date: August 17, 2017

    Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-05-15 18:25:39 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Training Options Duration: 90 Minutes

    Thursday, August 17, 2017 | 10:00 AM PDT | 01:00 PM EDT

    Overview: Many organizations that provide health care services also provide

    other services that are not related to heath care and are that not paid for by health

    plans or Medicaid. For such organizations a decision must be made: Do we apply HIPAA

    controls and policies throughout the organization for all programs, or do we decide

    what parts of our organization are under HIPAA and what parts are not, and designate

    Hybrid Entity status under HIPAA? There are significant impacts in making the choice

    to be a Hybrid Entity or not, and entities need to consider their own particular

    circumstances to determine the most appropriate path to take.

    If one portion of an entity is covered under HIPAA, the entire entity is subject to

    HIPAA, unless the entity declares Hybrid Entity status and limits the sharing of

    information between the HIPAA and non-HIPAA portions. Either option has its pros and

    cons and any entity's choice is not obvious at first glance. For something like a

    county government, it's easy to see that while the County Nursing Home may be a HIPAA

    entity, it would not make sense to apply HIPAA controls to the County Highway

    Department, and the designation of Hybrid Entity status for the county would an

    obvious choice, as there is no need to share any health care information between the

    County Nursing Home and the County Highway Department.

    But for behavioral health and social service organizations, the choice is not so

    clear. To be able to share information from a HIPAA portion to a non-HIPAA portion, in

    a Hybrid you need to have a HIPAA Authorization from each individual served, and you

    must have strict logical "firewalls" between the HIPAA and non-HIPAA portions to

    protect information from unauthorized access. You need to make sure any systems that

    carry or touch any Protected Health Information are secure no matter which model you

    follow would it be easier to apply HIPAA throughout the organization? You do, after

    all, have obligations to protect individuals' privacy, ethically or under the law,

    whether HIPAA applies or not, and HIPAA provides a good, recognized standard for

    protecting the privacy and security or personal information. And consistency within

    the organization is important - wherever you can reduce staff choices in how to handle

    information, you reduce the chances for making the wrong choice.

    There are burdens associated with either choice, and the best choice depends on how

    you do business and how easily separable and distinct your programs are. If there is

    no real overlap between HIPAA and non-HIPAA programs in services, locations, and

    staff, Hybrid status may make sense, but you will need to get a HIPAA Authorization if

    you want to refer an individual to another of your programs outside of HIPAA. If the

    lines are blurred and information needs to be shared to achieve the organization's

    goals, HIPAA-everywhere may be better, but it will require organization-wide policies,

    procedures, and training. This session will examine the options and the issues in

    choosing to be a Hybrid Entity or not and assist organizations in making the decision

    and implementing the results of the decision. Agencies will come away with a better

    understanding of how they should designate themselves and what they need to do for

    compliance in either case.

    In This Session:

    The definition of a HIPAA Hybrid Entity

    Typical Hybrid Entities

    Understanding your information flows

    How much of your work is healthcare?

    Requirements of not claiming Hybrid status

    Requirements of claiming Hybrid status

    The HIPAA Authorization issue

    Example Hybrid Entity analyses

    Policy and Procedure Requirements

    Documentation and Training Requirements

    Why should you Attend: Recent HIPAA enforcement settlements indicate the importance of

    properly designating Hybrid Entity status. UMass paid a $650,000 settlement amount,

    reflective of the fact that the University operated at a loss in 2015, for not

    adequately identifying all the HIPAA covered elements of UMass activities and

    improperly designating its Hybrid Entity status. Skagit County, Washington also

    settled with HHS after they had not properly designated the county as a Hybrid Entity

    due to its County Health Department activities.

    No matter whether the organization takes the steps to declare Hybrid Entity status or

    to implement HIPAA organization-wide, there are significant implementation, policy,

    and training impacts to consider. Going Hybrid means having a clear separation of

    health information from other information outside the HIPAA-covered portion, and no

    sharing of PHI outside the HIPAA portion with other portions of the organization in

    order to coordinate services can take place without having HIPAA Authorizations in

    place. If the organization chooses to take the HIPAA-everywhere approach, HIPAA

    policies, procedures, and training will have to be applied organization-wide, but

    sharing information within the organization in order to better deliver services is

    much easier. There are pros and cons to either choice, and the best choice depends on

    how the organization does business and the services it provides.

    Areas Covered in the Session:

    Find out how to evaluate whether or not your organization is best served by Hybrid

    Entity status

    Learn how to properly declare and document Hybrid Entity status when that is the best

    choice

    Find out what policies and procedures are required, and for whom, for entities using a

    HIPAA-everywhere approach

    Find out what policies and procedures are required, and for whom, for entities using a

    HIPAA-Hybrid approach

    Learn about the training and education that must take place and be documented to

    ensure your staff uses health information properly and does not risk exposure of PHI

    Find out the steps that must be followed in the event of a breach of PHI

    Learn about how the HIPAA audit and enforcement activities are now being increased and

    how you must be prepared or risk significant penalties

    Who Will Benefit:

    Compliance Director

    CEO

    CFO

    Privacy Officer

    Security Officer

    Information Systems Manager

    HIPAA Officer

    Chief Information Officer

    Health Information Manager

    Healthcare Counsel/Lawyer

    Office Manager

    Speaker Profile

    Jim Sheldon-Dean is the founder and director of compliance services at Lewis Creek

    Systems, LLC, a Vermont-based consulting firm founded in 1982, providing information

    privacy and security regulatory compliance services to a wide variety of health care

    entities.

    Sheldon-Dean serves on the HIMSS Information Systems Security Workgroup, has co-

    chaired the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange Privacy and Security Workgroup,

    and is a recipient of the WEDI 2011 Award of Merit. He is a frequent speaker regarding

    HIPAA and information privacy and security compliance issues at seminars and

    conferences, including speaking engagements at numerous regional and national

    healthcare association conferences and conventions and the annual NIST/OCR HIPAA

    Security Conference in Washington, D.C.

    Sheldon-Dean has more than 30 years of experience in policy analysis and

    implementation, business process analysis, information systems and software

    development. His experience includes leading the development of health care related

    Web sites; award-winning, best-selling commercial utility software; and mission-

    critical, fault-tolerant communications satellite control systems. In addition, he has

    eight years of experience doing hands-on medical work as a Vermont certified volunteer

    emergency medical technician. Sheldon-Dean received his B.S. degree, summa cum laude,

    from the University of Vermont and his master’s degree from the Massachusetts

    Institute of Technology.

    Price: $139.00

    Contact Info:

    Netzealous -MentorHealth

    Phone No: 1-800-385-1607

    Fax: 302-288-6884

    Email: supportatmentorhealth.com

    Website: http://www.mentorhealth.com/


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.