Annual Product Quality Review - 2017
View: 230
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501335LIVE?channel=ourglocal_Jun_2017_SE |
Edit Freely
Category Annual Product Quality Review, Manufacturing, Risk, Pharmaceutical Webinars, manufacturing technology, industrial manufacturing, industrial manufacturing industry, Regulatory Affairs Managers
Deadline: June 18, 2017 | Date: June 21, 2017
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-04-24 18:47:15 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview:Annual Product Quality Review (APR) is an evaluation conducted annually to determine if there are any possible changes in the process or manufacturing of the pharmaceutical product or any change in the specifications of the product or any change in the manufacturing process.Why should you Attend:This webinar will give a brief overview of the general procedure for the preparation and documentation of the Annual Product Quality Review and also focuses on the regulations and the regulatory requirements as per US and Europe.Areas Covered in the Session:Discuss how to write APRsOutline the requirements for APR reportingReview what information to include in the reportsDiscuss how well written APRs benefit your firm's complianceWho Will Benefit:Site Quality Operations ManagersQuality Assurance personnelPlant Managers and SupervisorsManufacturing Superintendents and ManagersRegulatory Affairs ManagersSpeaker Profile:Danielle DeLucy MS, is owner of ASA Training and Consulting, LLC which provides Pharmaceutical and Biologics based companies with training and quality systems assistance in order to meet Regulatory compliance.Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.