Understanding Risk Assessment of Proper Application
View: 218
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501190LIVE?channel=mailer&camp=Webinar&A |
Edit Freely
Category QA specialist, Managers, Engineers, Operators
Deadline: March 15, 2017 | Date: March 16, 2017
Venue/Country: Online Event, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-01-16 20:33:55 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview: Risk Assessment is a fundamental expectation in the regulated industries of pharmaceutical and medical devices. Performing risk assessments can be interpretive and needs to be well thought out in order to rationalize and substantiate conclusions drawn.Why should you Attend: The reason for attending would be to gain a perspective and understanding of the proper application of risk assessment. The proper practice of Risk Assessment is the current expectation of regulatory authorities.Areas Covered in the Session:The regulatory derivations of Risk AssessmentThe expectations of riskHow to properly analyze and determine riskThe fundamental equations necessary for risk assessmentThe tools of Risk Assessment and their definitionsHow to defend and assign proper riskWho Will Benefit:QA specialistManagersEngineersOperatorsSpeaker Profile:Louis Angelucci is a pharmaceutical professional and Certified Quality Engineer with over 20 years of experience in Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Validation, consent decree remediation as well as cGMP Compliance in the Medical Device and Pharmaceutical industries. Lou has worked for several well know companies inclusive of Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, Pfizer, Schering Plough and Merck. Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.