Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    DHF, TECHNICAL FILE AND DESIGN DOSSIER 2017 - Seminar on the DHF, Technical File and Design Dossier - Similarities, Differences and the Future

    View: 330

    Website http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900746SEMINAR?channel=mailer | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Design Control requirementsQA,QC,Regulatory Affairs,Medical Device,21 CFR,FDA Compliance Training ,Online Regulatory Compliance Training,FDA Regulations Training

    Deadline: February 28, 2017 | Date: March 02, 2017-March 03, 2017

    Venue/Country: Las Vegas, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-01-04 16:08:52 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview:

    We will consider the following:

    The Design Control requirements of the CGMPs, 21 CFR 820.30

    The Design History File - documenting Product Design Control and its nine elements

    The Device Master Record and the Device History Record

    The EU's Medical Device Directive

    The "Essential Requirements"; and their documentation

    The remaining elements of a Technical File / Design Dossier

    Trends

    Two attendee projects

    Why should you attend?

    This seminar / workshop will examine the existing and proposed requirements for the U.S. FDA's DHF -- including its derivative documents, the DMR and DHR. It will consider the European Union's MDD TF/DD requirements, and evaluate the documents' differing purposes / goals, their similarities, as well as the two different device classification schemes. Required and desirable contents will be discussed. Also considered: Areas requiring frequent re-evaluation / update; Similarities and differences; Future trends; Typical DHF Table of Contents; Technical File or Design Dossier Table of Contents; The importance and usefulness of the "Essential Requirements"; Structure of the "Declaration of Conformity"; self-declaring or Notified-Body reviewed; Parallel approaches to development. Finally, the differing approaches to file audits by the U.S. FDA and the EU Notified Body will be discussed.

    Who Will Benefit:

    This workshop will provide valuable assistance to all regulated companies that need to implement, review and/or modify their Device History Files, Device Master Records, Device History Records, Technical Files / Design Dossiers, documents, activities / plan(s). This information addresses Medical Device documentation requirements and implementation. The employees who will benefit include:

    • Senior and middle management and staff

    • Regulatory Affairs

    • QA/QC

    • R&D

    • Production Management

    • Manufacturing Engineers

    • Process Engineers

    • Project Managers

    • Vendors, sales and marketing

    • Any tasked with medical device development, documentation, and regulatory responsibilities

    Agenda:

    Day 1 Schedule

    Lecture 1:

    The Design Control requirements of the CGMPs, 21 CFR 820.30

    Lecture 2:

    The Design History File - documenting Product Design Control and its nine elements

    Lecture 3:

    The Device Master Record and the Device History Record

    Lecture 4:

    Summary of morning discussion

    Lecture 5:

    Group activity on the 1) The DHF, or 2) The DMR and DHRs

    Lecture 6:

    Review of group activity and Q&A

    Day 2 Schedule:

    Lecture 1:

    The EU's Medical Device Directive

    Lecture 2:

    The "Essential Requirements" and their documentation

    Lecture 3:

    The remaining elements of a Technical File / Design Dossier

    Lecture 4:

    ISO 14971:2012, The Product Risk Management File / Report overview

    Lecture 5:

    DHF / TF, DD Trends

    Lecture 6:

    Summary of morning discussion

    Lecture 7:

    Group activity on 1) The Technical File / Design Dossier, or 2) Essential Requirements

    Lecture 8:

    Review of group activity and Q&A

    Lecture 9:

    Summary of morning discussion

    Lecture 10:

    Course summary discussion

    Speaker:

    John E Lincoln

    Consultant, Medical device and Regulatory affairs,

    John E Lincoln is Principal of J. E. Lincoln and Associates LLC, a consulting company. John, a graduate of UCLA, is a medical device and Regulatory Affairs consultant. He has helped companies to implement or modify their GMP systems and procedures, product risk management and U.S. FDA responses. In addition, he has successfully designed, written and run all types of process, equipment and software qualifications/validations, which have passed FDA audit or submission scrutiny, and have been described in peer-reviewed technical articles and workshops worldwide.

    John has also managed pilot production, regulatory affairs, product development/design control, 510(k) submissions and risk management per ISO 14971 and implemented projects. With over 28 years of experience in the FDA-regulated medical products industry, he has worked from start-ups to Fortune 100 companies, including Abbott Laboratories, Hospira, and Tyco/Mallinckrodt.

    Location: Las Vegas, NV Date: March 2nd & 3rd, 2017 and Time: 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM

    Venue: Embassy Suites Convention Center Las Vegas, 3600 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169, USA

    Price: $1,295.00 (Seminar for One Delegate)

    Register now and save $200. (Early Bird)

    Until January 20, Early Bird Price: $1,295.00 from January 21 to February 28, Regular Price: $1,495.00

    Register for 5 attendees Price: $3,885.00 $6,475.00 You Save: $2,590.00 (40%)*

    Quick Contact:

    NetZealous DBA as GlobalCompliancePanel

    Phone: 1-800-447-9407

    Fax: 302-288-6884

    supportatglobalcompliancepanel.com


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.