Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    Webinar on Medical Devices Designing with Cleanliness in Mind

    View: 224

    Website https://compliancetrainings.com/product/medical-devices-designing-with-cleanliness-in-mind-9/ | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Clinical & Laboratory, FDA Compliance, Food, Drugs & Biologics, Information Technology, Medical Devices

    Deadline: January 31, 2017 | Date: January 31, 2017

    Venue/Country: Online, Canada

    Updated: 2016-12-19 22:33:41 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Cleanliness is a hot topic in the medical device industry. The FDA expects medical device companies to validate the cleanliness of their devices. One of the best ways to achieve a clean device is by designing it with cleanliness in mind.

    This 60 minutes webinar will provide in-depth and valuable guidance to medical device manufacturers on design considerations for both single-use and re-usable devices. There are certain design elements that are more difficult to clean and should be avoided whenever possible. With the “right” design, both the manufacturing and cleaning processes can be simplified.

    Areas Covered in the Session :

    Design Requirements

    Single-Use Design Considerations

    Re-usable Design Considerations

    Design Elements to Avoid/Minimize

    Simplifying the Manufacturing Process

    Simplifying the Cleaning Process

    Who Will Benefit:

    QA/QC managers and personnel

    Validation managers and personnel

    R&D and Engineering

    Manufacturers of Implantable Medical Devices

    Manufacturers of Single-Use Medical Devices

    Manufacturers of Reprocessed/Reusable Medical Devices


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.