Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    DEVELOP AN UNDERSTANDING OF FDA’S NEW ECTD SUBMISS 2017 - FDA and Electronic Common Technical Document - By Compliance Global Inc

    View: 338

    Website https://www.complianceglobal.us/product/700552/StephenAmatoPhDMBARAC/fda-and-ectd/1 | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Healthcare,Medical;Clinical;Pharmaceuticals

    Deadline: January 26, 2017 | Date: January 26, 2017

    Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A

    Updated: 2016-12-13 19:10:29 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview :

    Starting in May of 2017, NDA, ANDA, BLA and Master File documentation must be submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the new standard electronic common technical documentation (CTD) format.

    In addition, beginning in May 2018, all commercial IND submissions to FDA must be filed in eCTD publishing format as well. The CTD format was developed to assemble all the Quality, Safety and Efficacy information in a common format. This format has revolutionized the regulatory review processes in the US, Europe and Japan. It has also led to harmonized electronic submissions that, in turn, enabled implementation of good review practices. For industries, it has eliminated the need to reformat the information for submission to the different International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) regulatory authorities.

    The CTD is organized into five modules. Module 1 is region specific and Modules 2, 3, 4 and 5 are intended to be common for all regions. In July 2003, the CTD became the mandatory format for new drug applications in the EU and Japan, and the strongly recommended format of choice for NDAs submitted to the FDA.

    Why Should You Attend :

    Today’s competitive global health care market demands that product manufacturers commercialize their products with expediency. There are many global markets for which there is an unmet medical need for safe and effective therapies, including orphan drug markets, pediatric care, oncology and infectious diseases. Challenges included in the backdrop of this scenario include, regulatory as well as reimbursement and pricing challenges. In addition, regulatory requirements to obtain marketing approval can differ substantially between global markets, and regulatory professionals must often meet and complete a wide variety of regulatory submissions, depending on the geographic market of interest.

    One of the complexities associated with compilation of clinical and regulatory data into the eCTD guidelines format is transitioning from the standard FDA Form 1571 and FDA Form 356h format to the CTD modular format. Although from a theoretical perspective, the content of a CTD submission should not differ substantially from the traditional paper based regulatory formats, regulatory professionals may often be confused by the CTD modular format. In addition, when each module must be completed in an electronic format that is compatible with FDA software compliance, issues may arise with an inability for FDA to recognize the software utilized by a particular manufacturer.

    The eCTD specification format, although currently applicable in the US, European Union and Japanese markets may soon become the standard for other global markets as well, including Australia, Canada, China and Brazil. Therefore, by meeting the US requirements for eCTD submissions, manufacturers will place themselves in an optimal position to market their healthcare products not only in the US, but in other major geographical markets.

    Areas Covered in this Webinar :

    • The format and structure of complete eCTD submission solutions

    • Discussion of overhead investment (e.g., hardware and software) by your company

    • eCTD publishing and submission capabilities to meet PDUFA V eCTD requirements

    • Complete solutions for publishing of clinical study reports (CSRs) in eCTD-compliant and/or ICH E3 format to ensure reports are submission ready for investigational and marketing applications

    • Efficient maintenance and lifecycle management of regulatory dossiers

    • Complete solutions for outsourced publishing (full and partial dossiers)

    • Publishing deliverables prepared in specific data systems using specific tools and processes

    • Complete solutions for paper trial master file (TMF) document indexing, scanning and archiving

    • Complete solutions for preparation and submission of electronic drug listings, establishment registrations, labeler code registrations, lot distribution reports and GDFSI files

    • Structured product labeling

    • Access to eCTD experts for submission planning, placement of content within the eCTD structure and the development of detailed submission plans/maps

    • Expertise regarding FDA requirements of eCTD submissions

    Learning Objectives :

    • Develop an understanding of FDA’s new eCTD submission requirements

    • Be able to describe the structure and format of an eCTD submission and also the differences between the electronic format and paper based FDA submissions

    • Explain how compliance with FDA’s eCTD submission format will assist the manufacturer with expedient commercialization of new healthcare products

    Who Will Benefit :

    • Regulatory Affairs Professionals

    • Clinical Operations Personnel

    • Manufacturing Employees

    • Quality Assurance

    • Pharmacovigilance

    • Project Management

    • Anyone responsible for providing content for the CTD

    For more information, please visit : https://www.complianceglobal.us/product/700552/StephenAmatoPhDMBARAC/fda-and-ectd/1

    Email: supportatcomplianceglobal.us

    Toll Free: +1-844-746-4244

    Tel: +1-516-900-5515

    Level:

    Intermediate

    Speaker Profile :

    Stephen Amato, PhD, MBA, RAC, is Managing Director, East Coast Operations, for the Regulatory Sciences group of Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions. Dr. Amato is responsible for managerial and operational oversight of the East Coast business segment, including development of strategic business initiatives and management of Cambridge office associates. He is responsible for the growth of East Coast business and interacts directly with clients and global regulatory health authorities, including participating in and facilitating discussions.

    Dr. Amato has more than 25 years of experience in product commercialization in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. He currently serves as an Associate Professor of Graduate Global Regulatory Affairs at Northeastern University. Prior to Cardinal Health, he founded and served as the Managing Director for tJun17 Life Sciences, an organization that facilitates global commercialization and market access for early stage medical technologies.

    Prior to founding tJun17 Life Sciences, Dr. Amato was the Executive Director of Marketing at Anika Therapeutics where he managed all aspects of the company's product portfolio including market segmentation, targeting, positioning, pricing and promotional strategies.

    From 2000 to 2007, Dr. Amato was the Group Director of Knee Repair at Smith & Nephew Endoscopy where he managed a $140 million orthopedic product portfolio.

    Prior to this experience, he worked for Visible Genetics, where he was responsible for developing and launching genomic molecular diagnostics products used for subtyping Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and other infectious disease agents. He has also worked with Critical Therapeutics on the development and commercialization of treatments for gram negative sepsis.

    Dr. Amato received a doctorate in molecular and cellular biology and a master’s degree in business administration from Boston College. He received a bachelor’s degree in biochemical sciences from Harvard University


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.